SSI logo

Building Interoperability Standards for Physical Access Control

Unlike ONVIF's Profile S, which was driven in large part by the digital revolution on the video side of the security industry, Profile C for physical access control systems is the result of a more forward-looking approach.



By ·

In the analog days, devices from different manufacturers could easily achieve a level of interoperability if end users were looking to combine products from multiple vendors. However, with the advent of IP-based devices, each company created its own language through the development of its proprietary technology and protocols. This made it difficult to achieve interoperability among products unless someone was using the application programming interface (API) provided by the vendors, enabling IP-based physical security products to communicate with each other.

ONVIF, in seeking to develop a common language, created a specification that would allow this interoperability. As the number of ONVIF conformant products grew, and the ONVIF specification was updated and expanded to include multiple versions, there was confusion about which version of the specification was implemented by each device or client. In addition, key product features included in the specification were, at times, different on each device due to the flexibility of implementation guidelines. As such, some devices did not work as seamlessly together as designed.

The answer for ONVIF and for the industry was the introduction in 2012 of the profile concept, focusing initially on video streaming with Profile S, which now encompasses more than 2,700 conformant products. As a logical extension, ONVIF also identified recording and physical access control systems (PACS) as key areas for developing global interoperability standards.

Putting Profile C to Work

Unlike Profile S, which was driven in large part by the digital revolution on the video side of the security industry, Profile C for physical access control systems is the result of a more forward-looking approach. While access control has begun its progression from analog devices and systems to more network-based technology, the migration has not been as dramatic as its video counterpart. To aid in some of the natural hurdles of the transition, ONVIF has released Profile C, which can assist in opening up the potential for current and future product developers to move into IP-based access control.

Within the security community, there are several players who will benefit from the introduction of Profile C. This includes the manufacturer, which can now achieve edge-to-edge integration with a range of conformant door controls and access control clients and devices. The integrator would no longer need to conduct costly and time-consuming custom developments. Finally, the end user could build a control center or guard room that integrates different PAC devices and clients, but doesn’t require operators to train on multiple systems. An additional benefit for the integrator and end user is that they can easily migrate to an integrated IP-based video and access control platform.

Conformant Devices Scenario
A central guard station oversees a large office building, with dozens of doors and access points. From this vantage point, the security officer in charge can use the Profile C-conformant PACS to perform several key functions, beginning with getting a list of all the doors, access points and areas covered and their capabilities and relationships, such as which access points control specific doors.

The officer has the ability to control the doors as well, locking and unlocking them, providing temporary access, blocking a door and keeping specific doors locked or unlocked for extended periods. Information on the state of the doors throughout the building can also be provided, giving a snapshot of the doors and how they align with the current parameters set for each of them: For example, is a locked door still locked, or when an alarm sounds, from which door did that come?

The person on duty also is privy to information about the status of and changes to various access points covered by the PACS and can use the system to disable any access point so credentials can no longer be read when presented. A Profile C-conformant system also allows the operator to interconnect with the video system, relying on the interoperability with Profile S. So the officer on duty can respond to an event using Profile S-conformant video to see who at a door and then use his Profile C-based PAC to lock or unlock the door as warranted.

Profile C shares some capabilities with Profile S, such as the example just stated, and also with Profile G. And while not every device will have all Profile capabilities, having some key ones is a benefit because they are speaking a common language. Profile C is the next step in ONVIF’s ongoing efforts to anticipate the needs of the industry, helping it to future proof with products that will work with each other now and in the years ahead.

Baldvin Gislason Bern is the former chairman of the ONVIF Profile C work group and a Senior Test Engineer at Axis Communications. He can be reached at baldvin.gislason.bern@axis.com.


Article Topics
Access Control · ONVIF · All Topics


PSA Cybersecurity Congress
Latest Download
How to transition your business to an as-a-service model, and why it's beneficial…
Sammy Awards
Trending


SPONSORED LINKS


Don't miss out! Subscribe to Security Sales & Integration magazine today. - Security Sales & Integration

EDITOR'S CHOICE