As consumers, everybody tends to have a product preference or bias. If you’ve always liked Fords, you’re going to look at them first before you consider another vehicle. If your hot button is peanut butter, you may sneer at anything that isn’t Skippy Super Chunk. These products work for you, and while you may (or may not) consider alternatives, you’ll really need to double check things before you decide to go with Peter Pan Whipped Creamy on your sandwich.
When developing a request for proposal (RFP), consultants try to capture these product preferences. It could be that the consultant has worked with certain products in the past, there’s an installed base and compatibility must be preserved, the client has a preference, or any of a host of other reasons. Or, it could be as simple as making it easy for the bidder to understand what you’re looking for. Either way, bidders should pay attention to the brand and model number selected, and either match it or come as close as possible on their bid.
In many cases, the RFP will say “or approved equal,” indicating that a substitution will be considered. Sometimes that can be deceptive; many clients won’t entertain alternatives but have to put that to satisfy their purchasing department. At the other extreme, some clients will consider a product that is equal or better, even if the RFP doesn’t explicitly say so. If you’re not sure, it is always best to ask (sometimes “off the record”). If you can’t get a straight answer, consider providing the “equal” as an alternate.
What you don’t want to do is bid the project and install an unapproved substitution. At that point you are running the risk of having to rip the product out and replace it with the specified product, negating any cost savings you may have realized by making the substitution in the first place. Substitutions made after the fact are often denied, even if the client would normally have approved it. No one likes to feel cheated, and even if your intentions were noble, it may seem like “bait and switch” and leave a bad taste in their mouth. Like Peter Pan Whipped Creamy when you’re expecting Skippy Super Chunk.
Other Security Blog Posts
Under Surveillance | May 16, 2013
SSI Associate Editor Ashley Willis speaks with Matrix Systems’ new CEO, Holly Tsourides. Tsourides discusses her plans for Matrix, shares sales and marketing tips, and offers advice for women in the security industry.
Under Surveillance | May 10, 2013
The May issue of SECURITY SALES & INTEGRATION includes an exclusive and in-depth interview with Gary Lederer, business leader of Honeywell Life Safety, Fire Solutions, Americas. In this bonus blog post from Managing Editor Rodney Bosch's lengthy discussion with Lederer, the industry veteran shares his thoughts on how installing fire systems contractors can find success in the marketplace, as well as issues surrounding false fire alarms.
Under Surveillance | May 2, 2013
SSI Managing Editor Rodney Bosch speaks exclusively to Kratos Public Safety and Security's (PSS) Jim Henry. In this interview, Henry shares personal insights about his family’s business, Henry Brothers, and the trajectory of his own career path.
Under Surveillance | April 25, 2013
SSI Editor-in-Chief Scott Goldfine shares highlights from DMP's second annual daylong Owner's Forum, hosted on April 9 at the Wynn Hotel in Las Vegas.
Value-Added Security | April 25, 2013
Paul Boucherle explains this newly created acronym in his latest blog.