Security Sales and Integration Magazine

Mainstream Media Questions Merits of Home Security Systems

As other long-time security and alarm industry professionals will attest, no news is usually good news when it comes to mainstream media. That's because through the years, more often than not, when newspapers, consumer magazines, TV newscasts, etc. decide to dedicate some time or space to the topic it is about false alarms, fraudulent business practices, systems not working properly, cameras not being watched or recorded when crimes occur and so on. Residential providers, in particular, take a beating. It's no wonder many who work in the security industry have become as cynical and leery of the media as officers of the law.

Two more such portrayals were published by the New York Times ("Weighing the Value of Home Security System") and Smart Money ("10 Things Home-Security Firms Won't Tell You") this week. Both question the merit and effectiveness of professionally installed and monitored alarm systems. Many well known security sources are referenced (SSI magazine among them) and comments are presented from several industry professionals including myself. I must admit I am a bit dismayed to see my comments taken somewhat out of context and edited in such a way as to omit a lot of the very positive things I conveyed about the industry, its providers and solutions. I am guessing others appearing in these articles feel similarly and like me had no idea the final product would be so biased against the industry.

In hindsight I suppose we all should have known better given mainstream media's apparent vendetta against the security business. It must be acknowledged, however, that there is at least a grain of truth to many of the points covered in these articles. Those are instances where the industry must ask itself if efforts can be made to address those issues and strive toward further improvement. Regardless, there remains an inequity and bias in mainstream media reporting on our industry that does not appear to be abating anytime soon. All you can do is the best darn job you can for your customers and the interests of overall public safety. Of course, you can also write retorts to blow off some steam and attempt to set the record straight.

Some say any media exposure is a positive, but I am curious if Under Surveillance readers agree in cases like this. Where do you stand?

As always, thanks for reading ...

Scott Goldfine
Editor-in-Chief
SECURITY SALES & INTEGRATION

Read more about: Mainstream Media

Review / Comment


If you object to mainstream media launching misleading "vendettas" against the security industry, then you should not treat them the same way. I spend a great deal of time (too much time) monitoring media coverage of security and surveillance. In contrast to the Times and Smart Money articles, everyday I see a half-dozen or more "surveillance video alerts" on local TV station web sites from throughout the United States. In addition to helping law enforcement solve crimes, the reporters very often suggest that their viewers and readers use security techniques and systems.

The following appeared today on WALB.com (Albany, GA): "Surveillance video is sometimes the only key piece of evidence law enforcers have in solving a crime. We often run surveillance video on our news and viewers call in with tips that help investigators make arrests. But there are still dozens of unsolved crimes across south Georgia with good surveillance video we want you to take a closer look at this morning."

Quite frankly, that is a lot more mainstream than the articles that got under your skin.

John Ribbler
http://futuresentry.com
John Ribbler
May 6, 2010
was this review helpful?
You shouldn't be shock. Their agenda is clear, they are challenging the use of Surveillance period. The immigration issue is slowly moving forward as the next big fight. Next approach is waving the banner "Camera's don't deter or prevent Crime".

In Illinois we have the issue of RED Light Intersection Camera's - depending on which side of fence your on, can get pretty heated. Especially when the issue of Revenue Generating comes up {instant $100 fine} which can escalate to 100K pretty fast.

The articles you mention, point to a very narrow thinking mind-set. What they should be exploring is alternative uses for the camera's and the video content obtained. But their too hung-up on the Left approach to Liberties. Remember Chicago's Mayor Dailey wants Camera's on all highways as far south as Mexico. And he'll probably get private funding to do it. That's the way it's done in Chicago. Obama knows that.
John Feeney
May 13, 2010
was this review helpful?

Other Security Blog Posts

Enterprising Solutions | May 2, 2012

Back to the Basics of Camera Placement

While it’s true that modern cameras can often get you good images under lousy conditions, improving conditions usually improves the image quality dramatically. In that spirit, here are a few camera placement tips that we frequently see overlooked.

Central Station Corner | April 26, 2012

Layering Security Services Helps Meet Customer Needs

As security professionals, we strive to provide the best possible electronic security solutions for our clients that will meet their unique lifestyles or logistics of their business. This element should always remain to be our focus as we survey a potential or existing customer’s premise.

Value-Added Security | April 25, 2012

Tips for Designing Value-Based Solutions

In this blog, Paul Boucherle discusses what integrators must do to design the best solutions for end users.

Under Surveillance | April 19, 2012

Why the Most Successful Managers Support Mentoring

Are you currently mentoring your employees? SSI Managing Editor Rodney Bosch offers some insight on why mentoring your workers is essential to improving your business.

Laying Down the Law | April 16, 2012

Addressing an Alarm Company’s Name Change in Contracts

Ken Kirschenbaum advises readers on how to address changes in contracts after modifying the company's name..

Author Bios
Scott Goldfine
Scott Goldfine

Scott joined SECURITY SALES & INTEGRATION in October 1998 and has distinguished himself by producing award-winning, exemplary work. A Western Publisher Association's Maggie Award winner, his editorial achievements have included blockbuster articles featuring major industry executives. Since graduating in 1986 with honors from California State University, Northridge with a degree in Radio-Television- Film, his professional endeavors have encompassed magazines, radio, TV, film and more.


Rodney Bosch
Rodney Bosch

Although Bosch’s name is quite familiar to those in the security industry, his previous experience has been in daily newspaper journalism. Prior to joining SECURITY SALES & INTEGRATION in 2006, he spent 15 years with the Los Angeles Times, where he performed a wide assortment of editorial responsibilities, including feature and metro department assignments as well as content producing for latimes.com.