Security Sales and Integration Magazine

Fire Side Chat with Al Colombo

Fire Side Chat: Cracking the Code for Elevator Safety

Determining fire alarm priorities when elevator emergency phones are involved illustrates the need to sometimes fill in the blanks when situations fall outside the realm of existing codes. Having a third phone line or simply leaving it up to an AHJ are two potential solutions.

By Al Colombo | August 11, 2011 | Comments (3) | Post a comment
Jarret Van Berkom (pictured) of Electro Watchman in St. Paul, Minn., wonders whether placing a fire
Jarret Van Berkom (pictured) of Electro Watchman in St. Paul, Minn., wonders whether placing a fire alarm panel ahead of all else is legal, and what the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) has to say about it.

"We have a lot of apartment and office buildings that are connecting elevator emergency phones to the same phone lines as the fire alarm. They have the fire alarm ahead of the elevator phone so there is no problem with it interrupting the fire alarm signal. But what happens when the fire alarm goes off and seizes the line to send alarms? The people in the car are left without phone service."

The predicament above was brought to us by Jerret Van Berkom of Electro Watchman in St. Paul, Minn. He is asking if the issue of placing the fire alarm panel ahead of all else is legal, and what the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) has to say about it.

This month, we'll take a closer look at the issue of digital alarm communication transmitter (DACT) requirements. We'll also look at how something as critical as an elevator telephone might be dealt with in the field.

Topic Taps Uncharted Territory

First, let me say that the issue of an elevator phone and a fire alarm DACT is all too common. I'm actually amazed this issue has never occurred to me before receiving Van Berkom's E-mail. At the same time, I'm not the only one in the industry who was caught off-guard with this question.

The first thing I did was contact NFPA's public affairs arm. I was promptly put in contact with Lee Richardson, the organization's staff liaison, who was just as baffled by this inquiry as I was.

"You may be on to an entirely new question that has yet to surface," he told me in a phone conversation. "Let me check the code set that covers elevator issues and I'll get back with you."

Richardson called me back in a few hours with the news: "There is nothing in NFPA or other code sets that tell us what to do."

His immediate response to the dilemma at hand was to suggest the use of a separate phone line. Of course, that is not always going to be a satisfactory solution to this problem, especially when there are only two phone lines on premises and the owner has no intentions of adding another one.

What NFPA Codes Indicate

The first place we must look when there's a code question such as this is NFPA 101, Life Safety Code. Another important code set is NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code, 2010 Edition.

Section 26.6.3.2.1.1, NFPA 72, says, "A DACT shall be connected to the public switched telephone network (PSTN) upstream of any private telephone system at the protected premises."

In other words, the elevator telephone must be connected after the fire alarm panel DACT, which means that when the fire alarm panel is dialing and communicating, someone trapped in the elevator will not be able to get help through the use of the elevator emergency telephone.

To further illustrate the problem, Section 26.6.3.2.1.3(A) says, "DACT shall be configured so that, when it is required to transmit a signal to the supervising station, it shall seize the telephone line (going off-hook) at the protected premises and disconnect an outgoing or incoming telephone call and prevent use of the telephone line for outgoing telephone calls until signal transmission has been completed. A DACT shall not be connected to a party line telephone facility."

Some Reasonable Solutions

NFPA's Richardson made several suggestions, many of which alarm companies already follow.

"One solution is to use a third phone line," he recommends. And where there are only two telco landlines present, he suggests that cellular be used as a secondary means of communication for the DACT. In some cases, a single cellular unit will qualify for both primary and secondary paths.

Using cellular for telco 2 will essentially free up the second landline. In this case, the second landline can then be used to connect the elevator emergency phone to the PSTN.

"I would be in favor of using the second phone line for the primary elevator emergency phone," says Bradley Howard, a Columbus, Ohio-based NICET Level IV fire alarm technician. "The new NFPA 72, 2010 edition, does have some provisions that allow the designer to set priorities to the various life-safety needs. This situation most likely being people stuck in an elevator, I'd consider that to be an emergency to protect people first, then the building, then property."

What Howard is suggesting is that the elevator emergency phone be allowed to remain ahead of the fire alarm panel DACT on telco 2 using a line seizure relay that connects to the elevator phone.

Al Colombo is an award-winning writer who has covered electronic security and life safety since 1986. Visit his Web site at www.alcolombo.info, and check out his Security Sense blog.

 

Review / Comment


I wanted to put my "two cents worth" into this conversation. Usually the Elevator phone is installed by the Elevator Contracting ocmpany for new installations. This usally solves this problem of shared phone lines because generally the Elevator Contractor asks the Customer to provide a phone line specifically for the Elevator. Often times as we know the Customer takes this matter into their hands and tends to order only the phone lines that they think they need which leads to "sharing." It is our responsibility as Life Safety Professionals to not allow this scenerio and provide the Customer with as much information as possible in regards to the Life threatening scenerio of having "shared" phone lines. There are alternatives to which have been proven recently to be money-saving and life saving. Meaning the institution of Cellular radio as the primary means of communication, or other "Fire" U.L. Listed Radios as a primary means of communication. The solution is often determined by the "End-user" (Customer) because it's based on their budget. Let the Customer know that these options are both money-saving and life saving options. You can generate additional revenue for your company, as well as, providing a value-added service to your Customers while following NFPA 72 and Life Safety guidelines.
was this review helpful?
Christopher Yarosz, C.E.T.
August 18, 2011
I guess what I am looking for is a section or sections of the code that specifically state that the sharing of these phone lines is prohibited. Most Customers even when offered Cellular or AES Radio as an alternative refuse to install it regardless of the benefits as long as it is not required. Cost of service being the most common reason why. So if I cannot point to a specific code that states it's illegal, I can explain the benefits all day long and most customers will still not install it. So then I have a choice, do I walk away from a sale and refuse to connect it with a shared line because I question it's safety even though it appears that code does not address it as being illegal? Herein lies my dilemma. I prefer to have proof that it is illegal and then I can refuse to connect it improperly and the customer will have no choice but to do it properly and safely.
was this review helpful?
Jarret Van Berkom
August 19, 2011
ANSI addresses this issue. Although I do not have an ANSI code reference, I'm told that there is one that provides for a dedicated phone line. You are not allowed to share phone lines in this case. Most of the time, alarm dealers do not have to deal with this issue. But they need to know what's required. --Al Colombo (www.alcolombo.us)
was this review helpful?
Al Colombo
September 3, 2011

Author Bios
Al Colombo
Al Colombo

Al Colombo is a technical writer in the electronic security and fire protection markets, providing technical direction for security dealers since 1986. Send your fire-related questions and comments to abc@alcolombo.us.


Sign up for the eControl Panel

env Sign up here to receive current news and industry updates delivered right to your inbox.