Tennessee Law Prohibits False Alarm Fines and Related System Fees
An amendment prevents local governments from imposing fines or fees related to false alarm dispatches, alarm permits or alarm renewal permits.
Tennessee Senate Bill 1443 includes language to prohibit local governments from imposing fines or fees on security dealers and businesses for false alarms.
NASHVILLE — The Tennessee governor has signed a new law that prohibits local governments from requiring installing security contractors and businesses to obtain permits for the operation of alarm systems.
The bill, sponsored by Sen. Paul Bailey and Sen. Steven Dickerson, was signed into law by Gov. William “Bill” Lee on May 8.
Senate Bill 1443 amended Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 62-32-321, with the newly adopted section, which includes language to prohibit local governments from imposing fines or fees on security dealers or businesses for false alarms. Fees related false alarm dispatches, alarm permits or alarm renewal permits are also prohibited.
“It is very gratifying that Tennessee recognizes the importance of facilitating the installation of security systems, as well as the user being the responsible party for any fines or fees associated with the security system,” The Monitoring Association (TMA) President Ivan Spector states in an announcement.
TMA Vice President Don Young, who also serves as CIO of ADT, remarks that ordinances similar to one recently passed in Sandy Springs, Ga., do little to modify customer behavior or reduce the number of false alarms.
“TMA commends the Tennessee Legislature for taking action to ensure that municipalities in their state enact effective false alarm reduction ordinances. Studies have shown that the most effective way to reduce the misuse of alarm systems is to fine users who generate an excessive number of false alarms,” Young says.
In 2017, the Sandy Springs City Council voted for officers to stop responding to any home/business alarms that can’t be confirmed as a crime. Experts say other Georgia municipalities could use the new law as a model. The Sandy Springs law upset some alarm businesses who have appealed to the courts for relief.
The new law, which begins June 19, instructs Sandy Springs Police to not respond to residential and commercial business intrusion alarms without video, audio or in-person verification that a crime is occurring. Any violation opens the company, not the homeowner, to fines.
If you enjoyed this article and want to receive more valuable industry content like this, click here to sign up for our FREE digital newsletters!
Related Content
Security Is Our Business, Too
For professionals who recommend, buy and install all types of electronic security equipment, a free subscription to Commercial Integrator + Security Sales & Integration is like having a consultant on call. You’ll find an ideal balance of technology and business coverage, with installation tips and techniques for products and updates on how to add to your bottom line.
A FREE subscription to the top resource for security and integration industry will prove to be invaluable.
Some of us believe the new Tennessee state legislation, SB 1443, demonstrates the muscle of the big new guys, including Amazon and Google, who plan to re-set alarm industry traditions. Remember, TN was one of the several states that banned private monitoring firms from on-demand calls for police response to deterrent alarm signals, aka ECC (majority of all customers). When combined with this new legislation, it could quickly trend toward mass attrition and rebates, which would destroy the market and the market value of RMR, nationwide.
Source: Lee Jones; Support Services Group
So is this just for installing and monitoring contractors, or can the city also not require say an HVAC business to pay a registration fee on their alarm system?