LifeLock to Pay $100 Million Fine in Settlement With FTC
The FTC claimed that LifeLock violated a judge’s order requiring that it properly safeguard sensitive personal data like Social Security, credit card, and bank account numbers.
WASHINGTON – LifeLock, a provider of identity theft monitoring and fraud detection services, has agreed to pay $100 million to settle charges that it failed to properly protect its customers’ data, the Federal Trade Commission said on Thursday.
The FTC had accused LifeLock of violating a 2010 court order that required it to take steps to secure data properly and claimed the Tempe, Ariz.-based company falsely advertised that it protected that information, among other allegations.
The $100 million is to be deposited to the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. A total of $68 million may be used to reimburse consumers in a class-action lawsuit. The balance will be used by the FTC to reimburse LifeLock customers not involved in the lawsuit, according to the FTC.
The company charges $9.99 per month to monitor customers’ accounts to get an early warning of identity theft and to help them clean up the mess when identity theft occurs.
LifeLock said in the court filing that it neither admitted nor denied the FTC’s allegations. LifeLock said in a statement that it had already done system upgrades and taken other steps to address issues raised by the government.
“The allegations raised by the FTC are related to advertisements that we no longer run and policies that are no longer in place,” the company said. “There is no evidence that LifeLock has ever had any of its customers’ data stolen, and the FTC did not allege otherwise.”
LifeLock paid $12 million in 2010 to settle charges that it overstated the value of its services. The FTC said then that LifeLock advertised that it could stop identity theft for consumers who buy its service. But the FTC said the company’s fraud alerts did not protect customers from misuse of existing accounts, the most common form of the crime.
As part of the settlement announced on Thursday, LifeLock is required to refrain from misrepresenting how much they can do to protect their customers from identity theft and to implement a data security program, according to a court filing.
The commission voted 3 to 1 to approve the settlement. Maureen Ohlhausen, the sole Republican on the panel, said in her dissent that she was unconvinced that LifeLock had fallen short in protecting its customers data.
If you enjoyed this article and want to receive more valuable industry content like this, click here to sign up for our FREE digital newsletters!
Security Is Our Business, Too
For professionals who recommend, buy and install all types of electronic security equipment, a free subscription to Security Sales & Integration is like having a consultant on call. You’ll find an ideal balance of technology and business coverage, with installation tips and techniques for products and updates on how to add sales to your bottom line.
A free subscription to the #1 resource for the residential and commercial security industry will prove to be invaluable. Subscribe today!