$1 Billion Problem: Can CellBounce Solve the Security Industry’s Sunset Dilemma?

CellBounce’s plug-and-play solution is designed to upgrade 3G systems by converting its signal to 4G/LTE — no truck roll required.

The 3G/CDMA sunset is the security industry’s dirtiest little secret. More than 10 million alarm systems could go dark in the next year or two — three years tops — as AT&T, Verizon and other carriers kill their legacy networks in favor of 4G/5G/LTE.

Currently, no reasonable DIY solution exists for replacing 3G radios with modern-day communicators. And rolling 10 million trucks over the next couple of years is an impossible task.

The alarm industry is scared, but they don’t want you to sense the fear.

“People don’t want to talk about it, because then it becomes a liability,” says Mike Lamb, the serial entrepreneur behind wireless security and home automation companies Secure Wireless, Street Smart and Ecolink – all of which were acquired by public companies.

Can Lamb’s latest start-up CellBounce save the day? The company’s forthcoming patent-pending gateway promises to revive 3G devices for another 15 years or so … without a costly truck roll. The provider simply tosses the gateway in the mail and the user plugs it into an AC outlet.

CellBounce appears to have the only solution even  being contemplated for a hands-off upgrade to 3G-based alarm systems.

“Nobody has anything like this,” says Lamb in an exclusive interview with SSI sister publication CE Pro.

The alarm industry agrees. CellBounce is backed by the who’s who of the security industry, including 2GIG co-founder Lance Dean, along with founders and former leaders of Vivint, Honeywell, ADT, ESX and Z-Wave (as well as my husband, which is an important disclosure here).

How bad is the looming crisis?

The 3G sunset dates are still a little fluid, but AT&T is saying February, 2022 for its network. Verizon says it’s axing 3G at the end of 2019, with exceptions for some machine-to-machine (M2M) devices including IoT security products.

Any alarm panel that communicates exclusively over these legacy networks will need a new modem in the next couple of years, or else ….

Not that consumers even know how their security system communicates with a central monitoring station or interactive service (SHaaS, or smart home as a service). They could wake up in six months to the blare of a fire siren … and no one responding.

ADT, Other Alarm Companies Face Costly Truck Rolls

Alarm providers are terrified. ADT announced recently that half of its 7 million+ subscribers utilize AT&T’s 3G network. Upgrading them all would require some 100,000 service calls every month for the next three years.

Currently, there is no DIY solution for upgrading legacy (cell-only) security panels and alarm communicators employed by ADT, Vivint, Brinks, Guardian and virtually all of the leading security brands.

Until about two years ago, leading suppliers like Honeywell (now Resideo), 2GIG, DSC, Napco, Interlogix, Alula (formerly Resolution Products), Telular/Telguard, Alarm.com, Xfinity Home and so many others locked down their cellular radios, without user-replaceable options.

New alarm communicators are touted as savers-of-the-day with pin-for-pin replacements, Lamb tells CE Pro.

“But the problem is the truck roll,” he says. “Nobody has solved that problem.”

A single truck roll can cost a company up to $200, but even the most efficient provider tackling entire neighborhoods at a time can expect to spend about $125 per customer, according to industry estimates. The new hardware alone costs $50 to $100.

CellBounce (detailed below) is completely do-it-yourself, Lamb says: “Just plug it into an outlet.”

He expects the product to sell for less than $150 – “about the cost of a truck roll.”

(Image: CellBounce)

The ‘Upgrade Opportunity’ Fallacy

Publicly, alarm companies are telling investors the 3G sunset represents a glorious upgrade opportunity. Privately, they’re nervous as heck about the cost of upgrades and, worse, the loss of customers.

“There’s this whole fallacy of the ‘upgrade opportunity,’” Lamb says. “What are they going to upgrade to?”

It’s not like security companies can eke out extra bucks for swapping out a radio or sweet-talking existing customers into new features as they explain their old system is useless. The hope, according to many security providers, is to upgrade users from security-only solutions to security with home automation and SHaaS. Many advanced systems, however, will also need new radios by sunset time.

During ADT’s Q4 2018 earnings call in March of this year, company execs gushed about the opportunities inherent in a customer touch – even with a touch of bad news:

ADT’s new Command and Control security panel and service (the successor of Pulse) will “serve as a central piece of our upgrade strategy with current customers using legacy systems,” said president and CEO Jim DeVries. “In tandem with the announcement a central part of our strategy will be to offset the expected one-time radio replacement costs, with the recurring benefits of upgrading a substantial portion of our customer base to our latest technology in security and smart home innovation.”

And then:

We are assessing and we have been assessing the impact, but we’re doing it in the context of a broader customer upgrade strategy and so we know that we have an opportunity to upgrade our legacy customers. We know that some number of these customers are going to attract. We’re working with our partners on cost offset and working together to develop that upgrade strategy. And so we’re really sort of waist deep in the assessment, but engaging — sort of engaging this process from the perspective of an upgrade strategy for us more than purely 3G.

And more:

[W]e see this sunset as an opportunity for our Company. There’s some level of disruption in the marketplace as a result of it, with all the mom-and-pops that have 3G customers, even our traditional competitors and so there is an aspect of the 3G sunset that we’re viewing it as opportunistic for ADT.

And from CIO Don Young:

There’s a lot of features and capabilities that come with that Command and Control solution that we think fits nicely into the upgrade strategy.

The notable features include the ability for customers themselves to replace the radio next time ’round. Also, there’s two-way encryption between the panel and sensors.

Plus, the new radios can work over the FirstNet cellular network reserved for emergency service providers, Young explains:

An easy thing that we’re really looking forward to is, at the moment that we’re talking to the customer about the 3G radio upgrade, to bring this value to them, to explain to them what the value of that land on the highway will bring in terms of responsiveness.

Not Enough Time, Money, Labor

Regardless of any inherent opportunities of 3G, however, big alarm companies still can’t pull off the big swap-out – not in the next 30 months (AT&T) and certainly not in the next six months or one year (Verizon).

“There’s not enough slack in the system,” Lamb notes.

Even when the ADTs of the world take incoming calls from customers and prospects, it still takes multiple communications before an installer even knocks on the front door. Imagine when it’s the security companies themselves trying to reach their customers to schedule an install for something they don’t actually “want.” (And by the way, would you like to buy a more expensive package?)

And who is going to open an email from an alarm company with the subject: “IMPORTANT MESSAGE ABOUT YOUR ACCOUNT!”?

“It could take 10 million calls,” Lamb asserts. “Attrition is going to be impossible.”

Worse, customers will be able to end their contracts early without having to pay the usual penalty that makes the provider whole. Often, ROI can run three years for low-money-down alarm providers.

What’s the solution, then? Go door-to-door? Even Vivint, with its well-oiled direct-to-home machine, probably couldn’t pull it off. Their machine works so well because the young door-knockers get paid handsomely to sell new systems – not to fix existing security panels.

What about big installation companies like Amazon Smart Home Services, Geek Squad or Dish Home Services? Even assuming they had enough certified installers for the job, they’re charging providers about $130 per truck roll.

Adding the cost of a 4G module, “you’re looking at $200-plus in the best-case scenario,” Lamb says.

Multiply that cost by a conservative 10 million units, and you’ve got a $2 billion thing.

“Even with attrition and some percentage of upgrades,” Lamb says, “this is a $1 billion problem.”

He adds: “Everybody is calling it an opportunity. It’s really a liability they should be accruing. The numbers would be horrific.”

Continue to the next page to read how CellBounce works…

If you enjoyed this article and want to receive more valuable industry content like this, click here to sign up for our FREE digital newsletters!

About the Author


Julie Jacobson, recipient of the 2014 CEA TechHome Leadership Award, is co-founder of EH Publishing, producer of CE Pro, Electronic House, Commercial Integrator, Security Sales and other leading technology publications. She currently spends most of her time writing for CE Pro in the areas of home automation, security, networked A/V and the business of home systems integration.

Security Is Our Business, Too

For professionals who recommend, buy and install all types of electronic security equipment, a free subscription to Commercial Integrator + Security Sales & Integration is like having a consultant on call. You’ll find an ideal balance of technology and business coverage, with installation tips and techniques for products and updates on how to add to your bottom line.

A FREE subscription to the top resource for security and integration industry will prove to be invaluable.

Subscribe Today!

2 Responses to “$1 Billion Problem: Can CellBounce Solve the Security Industry’s Sunset Dilemma?”

  1. Carl Whitmire says:

    Hi Julie, hope you’re doing well, and that your Arlo Go is still protecting your property. Hey, just one quick note on this great article – “Telular” has only two “L”s in the name, not three.

    Carl Whitmire

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get Our Newsletters