SSI’s 2013 Industry Forecast: Vector Security’s Pam Petrow

The January edition of SECURITY SALES & INTEGRATION includes our annual industry forecast as a cornerstone of our special 2013 Industry Forecast Issue. For the piece, I interviewed 20 of the industry’s most knowledgeable market analysts, business experts, systems integrators, manufacturer representatives and trade association directors. Some of their perspectives can be found in the magazine article, with the balance of their assessments appearing in separate Under Surveillance blog posts.

Featured in this installment: Pam Petrow, CEO & President Vector Security, Inc.

What do you expect will be the biggest changes, challenges and/or opportunities as they relate to security technology and business for suppliers, integrators and monitoring providers?

Pam Petrow: Technology continues to rapidly change in our industry, which presents a challenge for the manufacturers as well as the installing companies. Not only do we need to be able to have access to and provide solutions that embrace the technology available, but we also must remain committed to developing our personnel to competently handle initial installations and ongoing support. From a manufacturing perspective, this is a challenge as new entrants approach the space from a more consumer-driven direction. Without legacy product, these new entrants can be more nimble and quick to market. From an installing company perspective, we have to develop operating models that reflect a shorter time between customer hardware/software upgrades. To our existing staff, technology creates a wonderful opportunity to learn new skills. It also makes our industry more attractive to a younger workforce that has been raised on technology and seeks to use these skills in their career.

On the business front, opportunity exists in the manufacturing sector for those companies that figure out how to provide a radio unit that can be upgraded without a truck roll. As products have a shorter lifecycle, the ability to efficiently upgrade units will become imperative to the installing company. Manufacturers also face the ongoing challenge of staying ahead of new entrants in the space and creating products that meet the expectations of consumers. For dealers and integrators, the immediate operational focus is upgrading customers with 2G service. This opportunity allows us to interact with our customers and to introduce new services. The challenge is balancing this customer outreach and conversion with new sales growth and allocating resources appropriately. There will be additional challenge in staying ahead of the carriers in the markets that will lose service prior to the final sunset date. A second area of focus is on the skillset of tenured sales and technical personnel. We need to make sure we are providing the necessary training so they are proficient and comfortable with the products and services we are offering and understand the importance of their roles in meeting customer expectations. From a monitoring perspective, as younger consumers enter the market as new head of households, they may need to be convinced of the value of monitoring services since they consider themselves connected 24/7. Monitoring companies are going to need to clearly define why their services are needed and how they complement and enhance self-monitored mobile applications.     

What do you envision as far the industry at large is concerned in 2013?

Petrow: Many owners have the perception that nobody can do what we do as an industry and I don’t believe this to be true. Getting the industry to acknowledge that change is occurring, new entrants are a serious threat and changing consumer expectations will impact their business model will be a challenge. We need to continually evaluate and strengthen our value proposition to the consumer in ways that differentiate the alarm companies from new entrants to the market that provide a broader spectrum of services. Also, the efforts of traditional carriers to deregulate could impact the industry. The alarm industry to a large degree has no control over the communication paths that it uses and as such is dependent on these outside providers. As the business models change for carriers and they adapt to remain competitive, our reliance on their legacy infrastructure could put alarm companies that are not proactively addressing this technology change at risk. Several new competitors in the alarm space are taking the position that they are not bound by licensing that regulates the traditional installers. If this is found to be a valid position, legitimate traditional installers will be operating at a disadvantage as their businesses will need to meet requirements needed to be licensed and to comply with industry standards. Standards that are written without consideration to new and future entrants to the market will create a competitive disadvantage for traditional alarm installers. 

What type of year is Vector Security anticipating for 2013?

Petrow: We are forecasting 8%-10% growth in revenue for 2013. We believe consolidation of companies will continue as technology creates an atmosphere that requires higher levels of capital to remain competitive with product offerings and service capabilities. 

What are some pressing security issues and surprises we might see in 2013?

Petrow: The industry tends to be complacent with a small number of individuals committing time and resources to evaluating new standards, responding to legislative issues and promoting the importance and value of professionally installed and monitored security. This apathy results in the thoughts of a few driving the direction of an entire industry. I think we have to continue to try to recruit individuals to be active in the associations and on standards committees and ask larger companies to commit resources to these important endeavors. We need to continually be aware of the stressed budgets of local and county governments. We have seen several areas where nonresponse has been proposed as a result of budgetary impacts. We need to stay active with our local responding agencies and help them find ways to address false dispatches and more efficiently receive information from alarm companies. The use of ASAP is one method that can help address this resource issue and provide the added benefit of faster response to our customers.

Scott Goldfine

If you enjoyed this article and want to receive more valuable industry content like this, click here to sign up for our FREE digital newsletters!

About the Author


Scott Goldfine is Editor-in-Chief and Associate Publisher of Security Sales & Integration. Well-versed in the technical and business aspects of electronic security (video surveillance, access control, systems integration, intrusion detection, fire/life safety), Goldfine is nationally recognized as an industry expert and speaker. Goldfine is involved in several security events and organizations, including the Electronic Security Association (ESA), Security Industry Association (SIA), Security Industry Alarm Coalition (SIAC), False Alarm Reduction Association (FARA), ASIS Int'l and more. Goldfine also serves on several boards, including the SIA Marketing Committee, CSAA Marketing and Communications Committee, PSA Cybersecurity Advisory Council and Robolliance. He is a certified alarm technician, former cable-TV tech, audio company entrepreneur, and lifelong electronics and computers enthusiast. Goldfine joined Security Sales & Integration in 1998.

Security Is Our Business, Too

For professionals who recommend, buy and install all types of electronic security equipment, a free subscription to Security Sales & Integration is like having a consultant on call. You’ll find an ideal balance of technology and business coverage, with installation tips and techniques for products and updates on how to add sales to your bottom line.

A free subscription to the #1 resource for the residential and commercial security industry will prove to be invaluable. Subscribe today!

Subscribe Today!

Get Our Newsletters