Vivint Doles Out $1.4M for Violating Alarm Company Act
Vivint agreed to pay a total of $1.4 million to settle a case involving instances of elderly and/or incapacitated consumers signing contracts.
Vivint agreed to pay a total of $1.4 million to settle a case involving instances of elderly and/or incapacitated consumers signing contracts.
Security dealers and A/V integrators must not force employees to work through lunch, nor can employees opt to waive their lunch break.
Smart home camera company Canary was hit with a class-action lawsuit after it began charging a monthly fee for features that were originally free.
ADT is suing to recoup $2 million owed by Adam Schanz, owner of Alder Holdings and various subsidiaries of Alarm Protection that was agreed upon in a 2017 settlement.
The suit charges ADT with two counts of negligence and one count of fraud, deception and breaching the Kansas Consumer Protection Act and its agreement with the victim.
Sharing footage with clients such as tenants of multidwelling units can be risky for security pros. Legal expert Ken Kirschenbaum shares how to protect your company should a request be made.
With the proliferation of doorbell cams such as Ring, Nest Hello and smart home security systems, the liability and ownership rights to the images is coming to the forefront.
As a security sales professional with your own business, protecting homeowners and businesses may be your primary job, but so is protecting your brand value and image. Trademark expert Josh Gerben explains.
Dealing with its second lawsuit in less than a year, video doorbell-maker Ring has been accused of stealing intellectual property from SkyBell Technologies.
ADT says Vivint used deceptive sales practices to mislead ADT customers into signing long-term contracts.
Support for higher power with PoE opens more opportunities.
Learn how a revolutionary digital system design tool, System Surveyor, is enabling customer engagement from the first site visit.
